[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: (erielack) Re: M&E/Rahway Valley
- Subject: RE: (erielack) Re: M&E/Rahway Valley
- From: "Tupaczewski, Paul R (Paul)" <paultup_@_lucent.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 16:57:12 -0400
You know, I've always wondered how this works. I'm assuming it all comes down to lawyers, but if I have a piece of property - a railroad - that I've always owned, and I wanted to restore the railroad, don't I have the right to?
Hmm.
<sigh>
- Paul
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Schuyler G Larrabee [mailto:sgl2_@_ix.netcom.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 4:24 PM
> To: Tupaczewski, Paul R (Paul); 'David Goessling';
> erielack_@_lists.railfan.net
> Subject: Re: (erielack) Re: M&E/Rahway Valley
>
>
> Paul Tupaczewski writes:
> >
> > If it's still railroad property, the NIMBYs really don't
> have much of a
> say here.
>
> Excuse me. HA, HA, HA!
>
> SGL
>
------------------------------