Charles_Walsh_@_Berlex.com wrote: >Bob, > >Interesting point. But since we have evidence that Bridge 59 is west of >Bridge 60 and Bridge 61 is east, the lingering question remains as to where >was Bridge 1 located? And how far east did the numbering go? And via >which route did the numbering scheme follow (to Hampton, to Hoboken) > Randy Brown said: It sounds simplistic and, perhaps, flip but Bridge 60 is between Bridge 59 and Bridge 61. We have been told where Bridge 61 is -- it's the next one east. So where is Bridge 59? I would suspect it's the next one west on one line or another. Perhaps the old Bridge numbering ended at Stroudsburg and New Jersey lines had their old numbering from Hoboken. bob gillis > > > > bob gillis > <robertgillis_@_veriz > on.net> To: erielack <erielack_@_lists.railfan.net> > Sent by: cc: > erielack-owner_@_list Subject: > s.elhts.org Re: (erielack) Bridge Numbering of the DL&W in Pennsylvania > > > 11/03/2005 08:42 AM > Please respond to > bob gillis > > > > > >Why does everyine think the the western end of th Scranton Dicision was >at Binghamton. My ETT 99 dated 29 Apr 1951 shows the western end of the >division was at Johnson City. If you look at the distances, Bridge 60 >was just about 60 miles from Johnson City. > >Binghamton was where the crews changed but was not the end of the division. > >bob gillis > > > The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List > Sponsored by the ELH&TS > http://www.elhts.org > > > > > > > The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List > Sponsored by the ELH&TS > http://www.elhts.org > > > The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List Sponsored by the ELH&TS http://www.elhts.org ------------------------------
This HTML page is © 2000-2009 Blue Moon Online System and The Railfan Network
This page and the data contained therein may not be reproduced
for any form of commercial use without the explicit permission
of J. Henry Priebe Jr. or his duly authorized agent.