[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: (erielack) Water Gap is water logged



 
In a message dated 7/2/2006 8:09:08 AM Mountain Standard Time,  
Edward.Montgomery_@_fcps.edu writes:

, I  never heard anything about the Delaware shutting down the EL during it's 
 years.  Are there records of it flooding during the DL&W  years


I recall some flood pictures way back with flooding of both  NYSW and DLW, 
but not much in the early part of the 20th Century.  The  "flood control" of the 
day (and up to early post-WW II) was to allow the water  to seep into the 
ground, and let the biomass do its thing.  Since then,  many paved roads, 
buildings, and development has significantly reduced the  ability of the land to 
catch this water.  I recall recently seeing a PBS  item on the Newark watershed, 
and how much of that region has been developed and  is putting more pressure on 
the remaining acres.  It said the previous  development did not have as large 
an impact on water diversion as current,  paved-road and concrete 
development. "...only the railroads passed  through..." was an interesting comment, but 
most of that had nearby  drainage.  To add flood control now would require  
eminent domain of many private acres--something probably not politically popular  
in the near term. 
 
Howard Haines


	The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
	Sponsored by the ELH&TS
	http://www.elhts.org

------------------------------