Phil, First of all it is "Shultz" without a "c". Second, no one argues the value of preservation and I never claimed it wasn't a good thing to do. I've supported these efforts with my checkbook so I must believe it is important. But simply saving a rotting hulk or saving something which there may already be one saved and in need of restoration is of limited value to anyone. Two rotting hulks are still two rotting hulks, not one preserved artifact. Romanticizing does not restore a single piece of equipment no matter how much one cares to engage in it. It's basic supply and demand Economics 101. With all due respect I believe you missed the point, it isn't whether there is value in saving something it is ok, so where's the money to first save it, then restore it and finally to maintain it in its restored condition. Just spouting off this should be saved and they should do it does nothing to actually making that happen. The ELDCPS is a success so far because people did something other than talk. Respectfully, Will Shultz ELRRco_@_aol.com wrote: > Dear Listers, > > While Mr. Schultz makes a very well-reasoned argument, I must > respectfully disagree with his point. Railroading is unique in that it > is one of the few businesses that is romanticized by many despite the > difficult labor involved in performing it, the tough relations between > labor and management, and the always contentious relationships between > the railroads and the communities which they serve. > The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List Sponsored by the ELH&TS http://www.elhts.org ------------------------------
This HTML page is © 2000-2009 Blue Moon Online System and The Railfan Network
This page and the data contained therein may not be reproduced
for any form of commercial use without the explicit permission
of J. Henry Priebe Jr. or his duly authorized agent.