Feedwater Heaters The previous answers to the questions were pretty much correct. As Irony would have it I was up to my .....well armpits, in a Worthington SA 4 1/2 hot water pump when this discussion was started. Worthington ( which was a division of Worthington Pump and machine) produced the B, BL , BL1 to BL-4, which were all about the same in design just increasing in capacity of water feed to keep up with bigger Locomotives. These were an open pump style feed that had the exchanger and pump all as one unit. they eventualy switched to the S, S-1, S-2, SX,SA and SA-2 which devided the cold water feed to it's own pump a seperate exchanger and then a hot water pump to push into the boiler. all these units were almost exactly the same. Only a trained eye can tell them apart. If you want a difference between them I can tell you but most were not visable differances. these were all open type systems where in the exhaust steam came into direct contact with the feedwater. the downside to this was the valve oil used for lubrication had a tendency to build up in the boiler and cause foaming as valve oil contained high quantities of animal fat. (tallow) which is also used for making soap. the upside was you had a thermal conversion rate at just under the flash point to steam. Now the Elesco K Bundle was also an excellent system it being closed with good thermal conversion the downside was that the bundle used copper tubes between the ends and the had a tendency to pull apart and leak. but over all a very simple and easy to run system. The exchanger was filled with exhaust steam and water was fed through inside tubes to get preheated and pushed into the boiler. Now a Coffin was almost exactly like an Elesco in it's base operation except the size and style of the exchanger. being in the smokbox or mounted out front. I have sent some scans of the different systems for you to look at. Any other in depth tech questions fell free to send in. As far as the Erie Railroad, almost everything with a trailing truck had a feedwater system on it, as the AMC was a big on the savings the they generated. A feedwater system was the second most usefull, cost saving, and labor saving appliance on a locomotive behind the superheater. Rich Young Worthington Feedwater Heater Midwest Tech Rep. Contact through www.765.org or John Rassmusen Worthington Feedwater Heater West coast Tech Rep. Portland Roundhouse or www.sp4449.com The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List Sponsored by the ELH&TS http://www.elhts.org ------------------------------
This HTML page is © 2000-2009 Blue Moon Online System and The Railfan Network
This page and the data contained therein may not be reproduced
for any form of commercial use without the explicit permission
of J. Henry Priebe Jr. or his duly authorized agent.