Re: (erielack) NW-2s MU Capability?

["toddsyr" <toddsyr_@_twcny.rr.com>]

A big thanks to Randy, Paul, and Bill for explaining this. I think that's
everyone. Oh yeah, thanks to Joshua too for posting the original query.
Without it I wouldn't have learned something new. Of course I'm saving
copies of the replies to the hard drive as some of this will require a bit
more memorization. Thanks again to all.

Todd K. Stearns

- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul R. Tupaczewski" <paultup_@_comcast.net>
To: "'EL Mail List'" <erielack_@_lists.elhts.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2007 11:07 PM
Subject: RE: (erielack) NW-2s MU Capability?


> Todd Stearns asked:
>
> > Thanks Randy. I get what you're saying, but that would
> > explain ( to me ) what 601-604/FE-13D means. My example was
> > 6011-6044/FE-DD. Anyplace I can look up the "key" for these
> > terms. Much appreciated.
>
> A quick key for EL classifications, in general order of how they appear:
>
> M = multiple-unit equipped
>
> Unit's function:
> F = freight locomotive (usually referring to a road unit)
> P = passenger locomotive
> S = switching locomotive (usually referring to a switcher)
> FS = freight/switching locomotive (usually a "roadswitcher" like an RS3 or
> GP7)
> C = commuter locomotive (used only on U34CHs)
>
> Builder:
> E = EMD
> G = GE
> A = Alco
> FM = Fairbanks Morse
> B = Baldwin
> L = Lima
>
> Horsepower:
> Specified in hundreds, rounded off to the nearest hundred
> D = dynamic brakes
>
> Additional stuff at end:
> 6 = 26L brake stand
> 4 = 24L brake stand
> 8 = ?? brake stand (only seen on U34CH's)
> A, B, C... = Variant of major class (SDP45s were MFE-36D-6A, while SD45s
> were MFE-36D-6)
>
>
> I think that pretty much covers it all (hopefully, this is off the top of
my
> head - please add/correct if you spot any mistakes)
>
> One anomaly: U34CH's were "MCPG-33-8" - odd, since the usable horsepower
of
> U34CH's is 3430, not 3300?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> And Randy Brown commented:
>
> > > If I correctly read Stauffer's ERIE POWER and Carleton's EL
> > STORY, none of
> > the NWs could MU.  Why should they?  They were yard engines.
>
> Not all the time - the EL used their NW/SW switchers for locals out of
> Croxton as well.
>
> And many roads (the P&LE comes to mind since I just saw photos of these in
> Steve Timko's new book) used them in multiple for yard hump shoving and
mine
> runs (LV and Montour come to mind)
>
> - Paul
>
>
> The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
> Sponsored by the ELH&TS
> http://www.elhts.org
> To Unsubscribe: http://lists.elhts.org/erielackunsub.html
>
> __________ NOD32 2232 (20070430) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
>


	The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
	Sponsored by the ELH&TS
	http://www.elhts.org
	To Unsubscribe: http://lists.elhts.org/erielackunsub.html

------------------------------

End of EL Mail List Digest V3 #2372
***********************************