"One anomaly: U34CH's were "MCPG-33-8" - odd, since the usable horsepower of U34CH's is 3430, not 3300?" I thought that you got 3300 when the HEP unit was operating - when not operating the HEP, the unit could deliver the higher horsepower... Rich Behrendt ELHS #384 - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul R. Tupaczewski" <paultup_@_comcast.net> To: "'EL Mail List'" <erielack_@_lists.elhts.org> Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2007 11:07 PM Subject: RE: (erielack) NW-2s MU Capability? > Todd Stearns asked: > >> Thanks Randy. I get what you're saying, but that would >> explain ( to me ) what 601-604/FE-13D means. My example was >> 6011-6044/FE-DD. Anyplace I can look up the "key" for these >> terms. Much appreciated. > > A quick key for EL classifications, in general order of how they appear: > > M = multiple-unit equipped > > Unit's function: > F = freight locomotive (usually referring to a road unit) > P = passenger locomotive > S = switching locomotive (usually referring to a switcher) > FS = freight/switching locomotive (usually a "roadswitcher" like an RS3 or > GP7) > C = commuter locomotive (used only on U34CHs) > > Builder: > E = EMD > G = GE > A = Alco > FM = Fairbanks Morse > B = Baldwin > L = Lima > > Horsepower: > Specified in hundreds, rounded off to the nearest hundred > D = dynamic brakes > > Additional stuff at end: > 6 = 26L brake stand > 4 = 24L brake stand > 8 = ?? brake stand (only seen on U34CH's) > A, B, C... = Variant of major class (SDP45s were MFE-36D-6A, while SD45s > were MFE-36D-6) > > > I think that pretty much covers it all (hopefully, this is off the top of > my > head - please add/correct if you spot any mistakes) > > One anomaly: U34CH's were "MCPG-33-8" - odd, since the usable horsepower > of > U34CH's is 3430, not 3300? > > > > > > > > > > And Randy Brown commented: > >> > If I correctly read Stauffer's ERIE POWER and Carleton's EL >> STORY, none of >> the NWs could MU. Why should they? They were yard engines. > > Not all the time - the EL used their NW/SW switchers for locals out of > Croxton as well. > > And many roads (the P&LE comes to mind since I just saw photos of these in > Steve Timko's new book) used them in multiple for yard hump shoving and > mine > runs (LV and Montour come to mind) > > - Paul > > > The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List > Sponsored by the ELH&TS > http://www.elhts.org > To Unsubscribe: http://lists.elhts.org/erielackunsub.html > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.5/791 - Release Date: 5/6/2007 > 9:07 AM > The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List Sponsored by the ELH&TS http://www.elhts.org To Unsubscribe: http://lists.elhts.org/erielackunsub.html ------------------------------
This HTML page is © 2000-2009 Blue Moon Online System and The Railfan Network
This page and the data contained therein may not be reproduced
for any form of commercial use without the explicit permission
of J. Henry Priebe Jr. or his duly authorized agent.