I also believe it is completely untrue. The NYC owned a sizable interest in the DL&W, not the Erie. On 7/4/07, Paul Brezicki <doctorpb_@_bellsouth.net> wrote: > > This is pretty far-fetched IMHO. "That new 99/100 schedule looks pretty > good, but let's run it by the folks at the Central to see if they'll let us > do it." Give me a break. Any communication that begins with "All will be > revealed..." tends to put my BS meter in the red zone. > > Paul B > > It is the tip of the iceberg. All will be revealed in one of my upcoming > books. But, the NYC held ownership of about 20% of Erie continuing into > Erie-Lackawanna. To make a long story short, the NYC went so far as to > dictate the schedules of certain Erie trains, including passenger trains > and TOFC business so as to not provide direct competition with primary NYC > trains. A lot of backroom deals were involved. > > John F. in California > > > The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List > Sponsored by the ELH&TS > http://www.elhts.org > To Unsubscribe: http://lists.elhts.org/erielackunsub.html > The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List Sponsored by the ELH&TS http://www.elhts.org To Unsubscribe: http://lists.elhts.org/erielackunsub.html ------------------------------
This HTML page is © 2000-2009 Blue Moon Online System and The Railfan Network
This page and the data contained therein may not be reproduced
for any form of commercial use without the explicit permission
of J. Henry Priebe Jr. or his duly authorized agent.