[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: (erielack) DLW Signal Questions



 
In a message dated 12/31/2007 7:34:16 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
graytrainpix_@_hotmail.com writes:

Second –  most signal systems are “fail safe”, in that a bulb that fails to 
properly  light up causes a train to receive a more restrictive indication.   
However, under the DLW system, there is one case where a failure might cause a 
 less restrictive indication to be displayed.  I.e., when a clear medium  is 
intended at an interlocking for a diverging move, the train should see a  
lit-up red in the top head over a lit-up green in the bottom head.   However, if 
the red on the top head were to fail but the green on the bottom  head were to 
light up, the train would see a dark upper head and a lit green  lower head, 
which indicates “clear”, as if a straight move through the  interlocking were 
intended.  A train could then arguably enter a  diverging route at too high a 
speed.  I would imagine that the DLW made  some provisions in its signal 
wiring to prevent this, e.g. putting the top red  light and bottom green light in 
series so that if one didn’t work, the other  wouldn’t either (of cours!
e, two dark heads would be taken as a  STOP).   Just wondered if anyone knew 
how this was  handled.




Jim
 
I believe Gordon Davids covered this with his recent post, (part) copy as  
follows:
 
The DL&W and EL were the only railroads I have ever seen that included  
non-illuminated arms in legitimate aspects.  The yellow top arm, when  
illuminated over a green bottom arm, downgraded a signal indication from  
"Clear" to "Approach Medium." Also, the red top arm in an interlocking  
home signal downgraded a "Clear," single bottom arm Green, to "Clear  
Medium," Red over Green.  If the illuminated top arm was obscured by a  
bird nest or anything else, the signal could display a false clear  
indication.

When I (as a Track Department guy) expressed my  displeasure over that to 
our signal supervisor, he told me that they used  light-out relays to 
protect against that.  But of course a relay  doesn't protect against a 
physical obstruction obscuring the lamp.  I  always considered that a 
violation of the fail-safe  principle.
 
While not being an expert in signal issues, I believe that "light out  
relays" cause the signal to be dark if any light in either arm fail.   Hopefully 
Gordon will correct me if this is not true.
 
SMT
 
 



**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes 
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)


	The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
	http://EL-List.railfan.net/
	To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html

------------------------------