[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: (erielack) Reefers #5000-5019



Your references are backwards, but still, I am pretty certain that AS BUILT, the 5000-5019 had high
brakewheels.  But I'll accept being shown I'm wrong.

SGL

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul R. Tupaczewski [mailto:paultup_@_comcast.net]
> Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 11:29 PM
> To: 'EL Mail List'
> Subject: RE: (erielack) Reefers #5000-5019
> 
> For reference:
> 
> 5000-5019: Roofwalks, tall ladders, low brakewheel:
> 
> http://www.railcarphotos.com/PhotoDetails.php?PhotoID=41989
> 
> 5029-5039: No roofwalks, short ladders, low brakewheel:
> 
> http://www.railcarphotos.com/PhotoDetails.php?PhotoID=41988
> 
> 	- Paul, recovering from the holidays and a horrific cold :(
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Schuyler Larrabee [mailto:schuyler.larrabee_@_verizon.net]
> > Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 4:26 PM
> > To: 'EL Mail List'
> > Subject: RE: (erielack) Reefers #5000-5019
> >
> > I can confirm that these cars, the first series of the "Cool
> > Whip" reefers, had roofwalks, full ladders, and high-mounted
> > brakewheels.  The second series. 5020-5039, were built after
> > the rules were changed, and had no roofwalks, short ladders,
> > and a low-mounted brakewheel.
> >
> > SGL
> 
> 
> 	The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
> 	http://EL-List.railfan.net/
> 	To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html


	The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
	http://EL-List.railfan.net/
	To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html

------------------------------

End of EL Mail List Digest V3 #2979
***********************************