[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: (erielack) $6M sought for Roxbury railroad

Those emails are especially effective if you contributed to the campaign . . .

But that doesn't mean you need not bother if you didn't.  This is an inclusive administration.  But
that's politics, and I won't go further with this.

SGL

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Brezicki [mailto:doctorpb_@_bellsouth.net]
> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 6:52 AM
> To: EL Mailing List
> Subject: RE: (erielack) $6M sought for Roxbury railroad
> 
> Michael, you are correct about "excepted" track. By way of comparison, Class
> 1 track has a limit of 10mph for freight and 15mph for passenger trains. I
> can't agree more about our "starved" RR plant. Mention of rail projects has
> been conspicuously absent from the new administration's frequent
> announcements concerning massive new infrastructure spending. We should be
> emailing the President's advisors and our members of Congress. Let them know
> what you think!
> 
> Paul B
> 
> From: Michael Connor <mjconnor_rr_@_hotmail.com>
> Subject: RE: (erielack) $6M sought for Roxbury railroad
> 
> Chris
> Any project that puts money into our starved railroad plant is good IMO.  I
> believe the term is "Excepted" track not "Accepted."  "Excepted" Track is
> the lowest level of track the FRA will permit operations to be conducted
> over.  IIRC it is to not exceed 10 MPH and no hazmat or passenger operations
> are to be conducted thereon.
> 
> 
> 	The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
> 	http://EL-List.railfan.net/
> 	To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html


	The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
	http://EL-List.railfan.net/
	To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html

------------------------------