[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: (erielack) Re: Chester Branch



Actually IMO if the reservoir proposal was serious the DL&W would had some incentive to keep the track for a) construction traffic and b) a better offer to buy out its right-of-way (active railroads are worth more than abandoned corridors).  
MJC

> From: dgoessling_@_yahoo.com
> To: erielack_@_lists.railfan.net
> Subject: (erielack) Re: Chester Branch
> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 06:22:59 -0500
> 
> Remember also that there was very serious proposal in the late 1920s-early 
> 30s to build a reservoir that would have flooded the valley of the S. Branch 
> of the Raritan from approximately Lockwood Gorge all the way up through Long 
> Valley and east of Flanders. This would have submerged the CNJ High Bridge 
> Branch along with most of the Chester Branch. I think the Depression and 
> local opposition quashed  it, but I wonder if the possibility of this 
> construction could hve been a factor in the abandonment?
> 
> This was a huge local controversy in the day that is largely forgotten. 
> There is a map from a contemporary newspaper in the locally-produced book 
> History of Middle Valley, NJ that shows the footprint of the proposed 
> reservoir. I'll see if I can scan it and post...
> 
> Dave Goessling 
> 
> 
> 	The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
> 	http://EL-List.railfan.net/
> 	To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html

_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™ Hotmail®:…more than just e-mail. 
http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_hm_justgotbetter_explore_012009

	The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
	http://EL-List.railfan.net/
	To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html

------------------------------