[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: FW: (erielack) Conrail did not buy Erie-Lackawanna..!
Sorry Paul, I don't agree, we have trains with leased locomotives on them all the time, railroads leaseing them do not have any title or rights to GE or GATX or whoever.........Lance
"Tupaczewski, Paul R (Paul)" <paultup_@_lucent.com> wrote:
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: MONTGOMERY| ED [mailto:emontgom_@_lan.tjhsst.edu]
>Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 10:39 AM
>To: paultup_@_lucent.com
>Subject: RE: (erielack) Conrail did not buy Erie-Lackawanna..!
>
>
>It is interesting to look back at the formation of CR. In March and
>April of 1976 CR bought full page ads in TIME and other magazines
>proclaiming a new age of railroad service in the northeast. At that
>time they proclaimed they were building on the heritage of the great
>railroads that were combined to make up CR. They had pictures of
>all of the CR member's locomotives with their logos proudly
>displayed. The only picture not correct was EL's because they
>were added so late. Their picture was a close-up side view of an
>EMD low hood unit with the EL logo on the side of the short hood.
>
>Legally CR had to acquire some title to the names of the
>companies they took over for liability purposes. Could you imagine
>a train with say a Reading name on it hitting a person and killing
>them. Without taking title to the companies, CR could have said:
>"Take your claims to Reading, it wasn't our engine". Something to
>think about.
>
>Ed
>
__________________________________________________________________
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop_@_Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/
------------------------------